blank white paper changes right into a one dollar bill.
Archive for April, 2010
dollar trick
Friday, April 30th, 2010Sudoku Chess Puzzles Spark Children’s Math Interest
Friday, April 30th, 2010Sudoku Chess Puzzles Spark Childrenâs Math Interest  Frank Ho
Â
Â
I have observed that one of the main reasons that children hate math is they have not mastered the foundation of math, surprisingly the root of problems can be traced to the basics they learned in the elementary grades such as addition, subtraction, multiplication or division. When elementary students are asked why do we have math? Lots of these children can relate math to our daily life such as shopping, cooking, measuring, driving, time, shapes etc. and most of the time they think math is important because it has something to do with counting and numbers.
Â
It is very good these youngsters realize that math has relations to our daily life but does the traditional way of doing of math worksheets such as 2 + 3 reflect the environment today our youth lives? It certainly does not. Math is not just about counting numbers. Apart from teaching the basics of addition, subtraction, multiplication or division, math is supposed to teach our next generation on how to solve problems and be creative. Part of the problems why some children hate math worksheets is simply because these traditional worksheets do not represent the world they are living now.
Â
Many “things” or “toys” our generation play already start to reflect what the society would be like in the future, things such as internet searching and browsing, image viewing, cell phones, roaming, instant messages, downloading and uploading information, compressed files, file formats etc. all of these will simply become part of their life and basic living skills. How do math worksheets reflect the way children are living now or will be in the future? Most school math textbooks still use the same style of worksheets to teach children basic math that is basically number crunches in straight top to down or left to right fashion. There is very little convergence of numbers, images, patterns, comparisons, searching, matching, sorting, classifying between one numbers operated with another number. This “old” way of manipulating numbers does not represent what our children are doing in today’s society. This may have explained why most young children still only think math as counting numbers, but not related to the way on how they process a variety of information in their daily living.
Â
Is there such a thing that math worksheets can be created so they will be fun-oriented that children can play with numbers and be rewarded with satisfying and with great fun? How can the dreaded drill style of math worksheets be improved such that they encourage whole-brain learning? How can math basics computations such as addition, subtraction multiplication or division be incorporated with fun gamed-based approach? Is it possible that children can improve their memory and problem solving skill in a gamed-based learning
Â
A small BC after-school learning center research team is making a big leap in creating innovative math and chess integrated worksheets (Frankho Puzzle). Frank Ho, founder of Ho Math and Chess, is pleased announce the production of newly invented and very unique math worksheets which have the effect of motivating students to work on math basics.
Â
The worksheets combine Sudoku, math and chess all in one and was invented by Mr. Frank Ho, a BC certified math teacher. These puzzles let children explore puzzles using chess moves while solving arithmetic problems including addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Not only they are fun but also could improve childrenâs arithmetic, logic and visualization abilities all in one workbook and at the same time.
Â
After inventing chess mazes, this is another world’s first breakthrough in creating math and chess integrated workbook using Ho Math and Chess’ innovative and patent applied technology.  Â
Â
Children are instilled with math concepts of line interaction, tree structure, and logic while having fun working on math-oriented puzzles.
Â
Frankho Puzzle is educational, fun and addictive.
Â
More information can be obtained by contacting Frank Ho at 1-604-263-4321 or visit www.mathandchess.com.
.
Frank Ho, a Canadian certified math teacher, coined the learning centre term Math and Chess and he also founded the world’s first math and chess learning centre by creating the world’s first math and chess integrated workbooks for elementary students in Vancouver, Canada. He invented Frankho Symbolic Chess Language, intriguing Frankho Chess Maze, and also an unique new chess teaching set. He published math and chess teaching theoretic basis in a Canadian math journal. The USA Illinois research data has shown statistically significant that Ho Math and Chess teaching method increases children’s math marks and also improves children’s critical thinking skills. The Ho Math and Chess Teaching Set can improve children’s memory by playing half-blind chess. More details, please visit www.mathandchess.com.
just for kid’s entertainment2
Friday, April 30th, 2010
Magic tricks for kids to make them smile.
money out of nowhere
Thursday, April 29th, 2010
you too can create money out of nowhere and amaze your friends
Math Games for Kids can help them learn
Thursday, April 29th, 2010Teaching a child to learn is never easy, especially when it comes to math. Of course, there are always the gifted children who can pick up math quickly, but what do you do when your child does not want to learn math or just does not understand it? How can you engage your children to want to learn more and more?
It has been proven that if you teach children in a fun way and engage them to want to learn more, they will retain the knowledge that has been taught to them. There is no better way to engage children than by making math fun with math games.
When I was growing up and was taught math, it was the same old dry teacher scratching out problems on a chalkboard. Now, there are better, more effective ways of teaching our children. You can teach using math board games, math flash cards, and many other ways.
Using this method of teaching engages the kids and makes them want to learn. Math games for kids are exciting and help the children to retain what they learn. But more importantly, they will want to learn more and more. After all, what kid does not like playing board games?
Math scores for American children have dropped year after year and other countries’ kids are soon going to surpass us. Children need to have every way of teaching available so that we can maximize their potential.
It is great to see these new methods of teaching our children. Standing in front of a classroom is no longer the only way to get our children to learn all of the basics that they will need in life. There better ways of developing our children to become the little scholars that they are.
Danielle Marie is a mother of two beautiful children living in Southern California. For more information on math games visit Sophisticated Kidz
The best magic trick in the world
Wednesday, April 28th, 2010
Your symbol is… Best trick in the world magic trick magic tricks magic tricks for beginners magic tricks for children magic tricks for kids magic tricks online magic tricks revealed magic tricks site youtube.com magic tricks with cards magic tricks with coins magic tricks…
How to Teach Math (Elementary Math)
Wednesday, April 28th, 2010How to Teach Math (Elementary Math)
Frank Ho
Canada certified math teacher and founder of Ho Math and Chess
Yesterday I was teaching a grade one girl and she had some trouble to figure out the answers with questions such as ? + 5 = 11 but when given the question 6 + 5 to her, she could do it with ease. So clearly the reverse thinking presents a bit difficulty to her. She does not have any learning disability and is eager to learn question. In 2-hour lesson she sit in front of me, she never asked for any breaks but continually asked me for more problems to work on. At the same time I was thinking about a boy who was about grade 3 and could get the following answer in his brain and his mom could not figure out how sometimes he got answers.
The question is something like A + B = 10, B + C = 16, C + A = 20, what is A, B, C?
Asked how he got the answer, he told me that because A + B = 10 which is smaller than B + C so he knew C is bigger than A by 6 so he substituted C = A + 6 into C + A =20 to get A which is 7. I do not know if he really figured the answer all by himself or he already had some training before he came to see me but still it is impressive he could do it all in his head and found out the relationship. Some grade 11 students in high school have trouble to work out this kind of problem. His mom told me that he is gifted.
I remember a boy who is 4 years old and could already do additions, subtractions, and multiplications all in his head but had difficulty to “see” what shall be the next move on the chessboard (even made wrong moves). Why? Do our brain process numbers and images (chessboard) differently? A grade 3 girl who came to my class and just could not do multiplication but finally could do it very fluently at grade 6 and I asked her what happened so she told me she decided to memorized at grade 6 and the same story happened to a boy, he told me that he finally “decided” to memorize it at grade 6 etc.
My purpose of recording many of my teaching examples above is to say that there are still a lot that we do not know on how children learn and how to effectively motivate them and get their interest in learning and how we teach them effectively. The most surprising I discovered is we have not taught children math in an effective way and perhaps in the wrong way. I will explain my thinking and observations below.
Other than gifted children, the math skills need to be taught to children and also learned by children. The examples of Pascal who could add from 1 to 100 without being taught and the boy cited above who could do simultaneous equations in his head are examples that some children could do math in their head with a method. How they possess these “methods” in their head without being taught is interesting. What happens to those children who were not born with these “methods’ in their brain? We can train them but how?
Most math worksheets today are not designed in a way to require children to do a lot of thinking and basically are done with repetitions to get proficiency and fluency. Many times, we see word problems require children to do backwards calculations but do we have basics worksheets to encourage backward calculations or reversing thinking?
I did an experiment on the first girl I mentioned that I gave her some training on ? + 5 = 11 similar type of questions then eventually she was happy since she could do all kinds of similar problems with different numbers but the interesting experiment is the minute I changed the question to the following circle + triangle = 11, triangle = 5 and what is the value of circle? She got confused but we know all I did was simply replace numbers by symbols and she got into trouble again. The next level will be to replace symbols by variables to go into algebra. From this experiment, I learned that it is very important to train children with symbols at very earlier age so that they are not afraid about symbols. The problem is most worksheets one can buy is not designed this way and does not foster the thinking to go from “figures” or pictures to symbols.
The biggest problem is that we are failing to teach how to do reverse thinking and how to solve word problems. It seems strange to children that once they master their basics computation skills they face another hurdle that is they still have to learn another set of skills to do word problems. This is the problem that we as educators have not come up with a transition way to show children on how to go from “computation” to “word problem”.
Many math teachers are making mistakes by using the methods of explaining the concepts to do calculations as well. For example, the method of using “tiles” to explain how to do integers is fine but it is entire different mater to use the “tile method” to do actual computations. It is too slow and cumbersome and children will lose confidence if to use the tile method every time to do integers calculations. The same problems with times table using skip counts or subtractions using count back, all these are good for explaining concepts but to get the fluency children required to move ahead, then children can not rely on count back every time to do subtractions. I ask one child who is using finger method to do multiplication by 2 hands (he is grade 5), “Are you going to put your pencil down and so you can use your 2 hands to do calculations at grocery counter with you wife and children standing in front of you?” If not then what good is the finger method when it actually allows children to use outside instrument (similar to the idea of using a calculator), not their mental power to help them to develop their brain?
As I observe more of how my students learn and how they react to the problems I present to them, the more strong feeling that I know that the there are problems with our math worksheets, for example, these conventional worksheets do not train children on how to do word problems. The worst is that some math capability some of these gifted are born with but can be trained are not provided in the worksheets for a normal child to learn those skills. I believe that if educators realize these problems then we will have more happy children who at least will not hate math.
At Ho Math and Chess, I am leading a team to continuously develop revolutionary worksheets, which I hope to achieve 3 purposes. The first one is a very realistic one that is it must be helpful to children’s school math so the end result is our worksheets must boost their school marks. To achieve this purpose I need to observe where are the bottlenecks of worksheets and their achievement and how we can improve our worksheets so I do “experiment” on my students using our invented worksheets. The second one is these worksheets must be interesting and this is most difficult to achieve with pencil and paper type of worksheets but is easier with computer interactive mode but we still need children to work on pencil and paper to see how they arrive answers so we can help children. With our invention of Symbolic Chess Language, we have successfully integrated math and chess so we are on the right track. The third is I try to develop worksheets, which also improve their brainpower. This has been achieved with our puzzle-like intriguing math computation problems.
More information on Ho Math and Chess teaching method can be found at www.mathandchess.com.
Frank Ho, a Canadian certified math teacher, coined the learning centre term Math and Chess and he also founded the world’s first math and chess learning centre by creating the world’s first math and chess integrated workbooks for elementary students in Vancouver, Canada. He invented Frankho Symbolic Chess Language, intriguing Frankho Chess Maze, and also an unique new chess teaching set. He published math and chess teaching theoretic basis in a Canadian math journal. The USA Illinois research data has shown statistically significant that Ho Math and Chess teaching method increases children’s math marks and also improves children’s critical thinking skills. The Ho Math and Chess Teaching Set can improve children’s memory by playing half-blind chess. More details, please visit www.mathandchess.com.
Magic Kit Video
Tuesday, April 27th, 2010
An excellent Magic Kit for beginners!
Dyscalculia Children Cases Documented – Article 1
Tuesday, April 27th, 2010Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Dyscalculia Children Cases Documented â Article 1
Â
Frank HoÂ
Canada certified math teacherÂ
Ho Math and Chess Learning CentreÂ
www.mathandchess.com                                                     Â
                                                          January 2, 2010
Â
After starting to pay attention to dyscalculia children, I noticed there are some general symptoms emerged from those children.
There are many different views on how dyscalculia shall be defined. A neuroscientist might define it from the scanning result of a childâs brain, a psychologist might define it from the result of psychometric test, and a math educator might define it as a result of a math ability test. As a math educator, my interest is to observe and to find out why a dyscalculia child has fallen through crack and what I can do about it? My observations are:Â
1.    It could happen when children are very young even as young as 5 years old, at this stage many parents will draw their own conclusions to be just because their children are young.
2.    Dyscalculia could also persist to older grades like grade 7 and after this, the symptoms start to appear unnoticeable to parents since they are allowed to use calculators but could be detected by very experienced math tutors by watching and examining their calculation steps. A decisive sign is they never seem to be able to keep math at A regardless how much efforts math tutor has put in.
3.    It may have something to do with their general intelligence level although some parents only complain about their childrenâs math marks.
4.    Dyscalculia children may be very talkative but when asked math questions, all the sudden, they become different persons – they are very quiet. When asked the reasons why they gave some answers, they normally could not say anything. There were confused about their own answers and simply could not make a reason themselves why they gave an answer â no reason given.
5.    They seem to have poor memory and are not able to get answers using taught knowledge. For example, if 5 + 5 = 10, they know it but when asked 5 + 6 or 5+ 7 is what then they might get confused.
6.    Their response time to get answers is normally longer then non-dyscalculia children.
7.    They cannot do mental math, instead, they use fingers to physically count each number to get answers. All calculations are done with the idea they can physically see or touch to get answer. They do not know how to transfer the computational procedure to their brains.Â
The following documents my experience with children who have learning difficulties in learning arithmetic.Â
Case 1. Boy A, grade 4.Â
On the second day (January 3, 2009) of class, I tested him both in writing and orally and found out he seems to have dyscalculia and his parent apparently is not aware of it. His father mentioned that he also had English reading problem and after getting special help from school, he is now better. Father mentioned that his school did not teach him math. Boy A could do 7 + 5 = 12 but when asked orally about what was 5 + 7, he did not know or would give some illogical answers. Many dyscalculia children do not seem to understand commutative law. After using objects to explain, he understood but gave wrong answers when the same question was asked again later. He could not do 11- 2 or any borrowing at all at grade 4. He could not do what is 5 plus 10 or sometimes he could do but he could not do it again if the numbers changed to 10 + 7. He has no sense of how a ten can be added to 5 and he could not see the pattern when a single digit is added to 10.Â
I am going to give him some special worksheets so he has a chance to actually write out each questions to reinforce his memory and these questions are also specially designed so that he should be able to âseeâ patterns between each question.Â
January 4, 2009
I invited Boy A to come for a further review since I wanted to know if he has some memory problem and a simple test shows that his memory is average. I asked him how he did his calculation and he told me that he was taught to count the number of dots when doing addition. For example, 3 + 2 he would count 3 dots and then 2 dots to get 5 and then he carried on to use this method to do all addition and subtractions. He uses fingers to do additions or subtractions and sometimes he feels he does not have enough fingers to do calculations. This could be a source of his problems that is a way of teaching concept was then carried on by him as a procedure of doing all calculations, a big mistake. Boy A never learned the technique of comparing computation patterns and school work did not provide him with enough practices to hone his skills and also he did not have the innate to get number sense by himself.Â
I start to suspect the teaching method of addition and subtraction at schools might be problematic for some children.Â
For example, when adding 5 + 3, students were taught to draw 5 dots and then 3 dots so a child would count each dot sequentially to get the answer 8. If a child starts to use this method (by drawing dots or use fingers) for all his additions then it would be a problem when this child is doing additions by counting each dot sequentially, the child will never get the fluency of addition. In most math teachings, dots, fingers, beans are often used as manipulative for this kind of sequential forward counting or backward counting for teaching addition or subtraction; children will have problem with subtraction since they did not get the idea of part1 + part 1 = total. So when doing the reverse of addition (subtraction), it will be difficult for them.Â
They were taught to count, skip counting using dots etc, but were not taught on how to add by relationships, logic, and comparisons etc. techniques.Â
They need to be taught on how to use âtechniquesâ to do addition and subtraction, not by counting. There is something wrong with our school math education at the beginning level.Â
I guided him by using comparisons between adding numbers and taught how he could use different techniques to do computation instead of relying on counting fingers.Â
In 2-hour of work, he already showed improvements in his speed and accuracies to get answers right, his rapid improvement is encouraging. I assign some homework, which reinforces pattern and also counting of adding up to 10 and also doubling. All these are aiming to get him away from using fingers but to use more of his brains to figure out answers him self.Â
January 9, 2010Â
Boy A has improved. He is able to do one digit addition rather quickly and without counting every numbers to get the total.Â
His improvement is remarkable. When compared to a girl whom I taught but did not show significantly improvement the reasons were:Â
1.    Her parents not only wanted to see improvements in her basics such as addition, subtraction but also insisted that we should help her on her then current schoolwork and hoped she could get âgoodâ marks. This approach put lots of pressure on her and she simply did very little practice on her basics.
2.    Her parentsâ emphasis seemed to be on marks but not to give her time to be fluent with basics.
3.    The girl âtellsâ her parents what she wants to do, not the other around, she is the queen and parents are just servants.Â
January 27, 2010Â
Boy A still progresses but has slowed a bit since for twice I a row, he did not do any homework I assigned to him. He told me he was too busy. He is now able to do reverse calculation so he is still significant better then he was when he first attended Ho Math and Chess math class. I phoned his father to tell him that Boy A needs to continue to do work at home, his father asked me how he is doing and I honestly told him how I felt he has made progress. I feel strange that he did not give me any feedback how he has felt about his own sonâs status so far.Â
January 30, 2010Â
Boy A has not been doing his homework; I am disappointed so he was asked to do his homework in my class. His progress has staled but is still much better than where he was when joined my class.Â
February 14, 2010Â
I am somewhat disappointed about Boy Aâs progress since today I discovered that has done some pages very wrong when carrying over 1 to hundredâs place. This errors can be very easily checked and stopped at home only if his parents could spare a bit time to check on his work but despite my request the cooperation was not forthcoming. The teaching has been dampened by Boy Aâs showing of interests in taking a bit challenge at all when some of my invented new worksheets were showed to him.Â
I feel like to close this case with the following observations:Â
1.    A child needs to be helped with parentâs active involvement at home or at least monitoring.
2.    The child has to learn to take an active role in learning, it does not help if a child shows no interest in understanding concept teaching but only wants to know how to work out the procedure and be done with homework.   Â
Case 2. Boy J, kindergartenÂ
January 20, 2010Â
This boy is very interesting because all he wants is to play chess but he does not think while playing, only interested in pushing âwoodâ. He gets mad and even threw pieces around if he loses games. He eyes look at other side way when I tried to explain to him on how to do worksheet, he would not even allow himself to have a chance to listen other than asking for candy or play chess. This is a very tough case to handle. He does math by physically count each object so 5 + 2, he will count 5 fingers and then plus 2 fingers or he will draw 5 circles and then 2 circles to get answer.Â
I asked his mom what interests him, maze is what his mom told me, so I created a chess maze for him but to make a move he needs to calculate some simple math to move around, he will not even listen to me on how the maze should be played. I had to give it up and asked his mom to try it at home. He refused to do it by scribbling random lines on the entire maze I printed for him so the maze is basically defaced and announced uselessness to work on.
I then created some number mixed with dots to mimic his way of doing finger math but trying to get him away from using fingers or drawing dots so his calculation will be slowly transferred to his brain without physically using fingers or dots. I await his response when I give to him in the next class.Â
Chess teacher has to constantly remind him to sit nicely and pay attention.Â
Boy Jâs mom told me that when Boy J was young his grandma always let him to have his way and this even caused conflicts between mom and grandma on how to educate Boy J.Â
Boy J is difficult for me to say if he has dyscalculia or not since he is just beginning to learn math, one thing I can see is he does not want to do it, and he only wants to do some tasks, which he does not have to use a lot of thinking. This is evident in his way of playing chess since other than trying to follow chess rules, he is not interesting in any âcause-consequenceâ effect.Â
January 30, 2010Â
Mom did not stay with Boy J and he did not want to do any math work so mom asked him to be sent to the chess class. I asked mom to supervise Boy J to do the new set of math worksheets at home.Â
February 14, 2010Â
Boy Jâs mom is taking an active role in helping her boy at home and she also make sure that he would finish all his assigned homework, he continue to make progress and does not count on his fingers to get answers when doing 1-digit to 1-digit addition, but still having trouble to sit straight in his seat to do work other than playing chess. I have given him more worksheets especially designed for him to continue to encourage him to work on math worksheets.Â
Perhaps when he gets a bit more mature then he would overcome his own weakness by not being able to sit at his own seat and does work. Now his mom has to sit beside him to get him to do work, and this is not a long-term solution of course. He is able to sit down when he plays chess but is not able to sit down when he does math.
Frank Ho is a Canada certified math tewacher and also the founder of Ho Math and Chess learning center. Ho Math and Chess is the only international child franchise dedicated to teaching children math using math, chess, puzzles and virtual toys integrated workbooks. More information on Ho Math and Chess innovatie workbooks, please visit www.mathandchess.com or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iFDPJVzQtI.
Floating Note Trick
Tuesday, April 27th, 2010
Magic Tricks You Can Do at Home! For more info : momsbiz.ws